NEWYou can now hear to WHD News content!
A California juror in Scott Peterson’s 2004 murder demo has denied lying on a jury questionnaire inspite of conceding she might have loaded it out improperly as the convicted killer’s attorneys are inquiring a decide to throw out his conviction mainly because she might have been biased.
Peterson was convicted of killing his pregnant spouse, Laci Peterson, and their unborn son, then dumping them in the San Francisco Bay on Christmas Eve in 2002. They washed up separately months afterwards.
Richelle Great, who served as Juror No. 7 in the original trial, agreed to testify before this thirty day period soon after prosecutors available her immunity. The hearing commenced Friday and was anticipated to past a week.
SCOTT PETERSON JUROR RICHELLE Awesome COULD TESTIFY IN Exchange FOR IMMUNITY Give AS Wife KILLER SEEKS NEW Demo
In her jury questionnaire, Wonderful denied acquiring been the target of a crime or acquiring been concerned in a prior lawsuit, in accordance to Peterson’s defense group. But they say she hid the fact that she had been crushed though pregnant by a boyfriend in 2001 and that on yet another celebration, expecting with a various kid, she attained a restraining get from a boyfriend’s ex – which Peterson’s legal professionals say amounts to a style of lawsuit.
They argued that Nice’s standing as a domestic violence survivor biased her in the situation and that she purposely attempted to get on to the jury.
Good has maintained for a long time that she was not biased and did not lie in get to check out and get on the jury.
In sworn testimony on Friday and again on Monday, she reported she was truthful on the jury questionnaire, even if she answered improperly.
“When I crammed out that questionnaire, honestly and actually, very little of this ever crossed my mind, at any time,” she stated Monday.
REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK: RETURN TO REDWOOD City — THE RESENTENCING OF SCOTT PETERSON
Prosecutors also disputed the defense team’s assertion that Good went out of her way to get on to the jury – pulling out a transcript of the assortment system that showed she’d initially been dismissed from the jury pool with no complaint.
She only came again upon the ask for of Peterson’s lawyer, Mark Geragos. Geragos has independently stated in courtroom filings that if he’d recognised about Nice’s history he would have sought to have her eliminated from the jury. He did not instantly respond to a ask for for remark but is envisioned to testify on the situation.
Peterson initially acquired a death sentence in 2005 – but in December a resentencing improved that to everyday living with out parole.
Simply click Listed here TO GET THE WHD News Application
His defense group is trying to influence California Superior Courtroom Choose Anne-Christine Massullo that he didn’t receive a honest demo mainly because of Nice’s alleged lie and bias.
Peterson’s present legal professional, Pat Harris, did not quickly react to a request for comment.
The contributed to this report.